AI Query Risk Check
A Voiceflow prototype for workplace AI governance triage
designed by Kirsten Johnsen targeting users with no pre-existing AI governance training.
A Voiceflow prototype for workplace AI governance triage
designed by Kirsten Johnsen targeting users with no pre-existing AI governance training.
I build practical systems that help people use technology with more confidence, clarity, and care.
I turn complex workflows into usable processes that support both the people doing the work and the organization they serve.
I am especially interested in the space where conversation design, operational workflows, customer support, and responsible AI meet. I believe the best systems are not just technically functional; they help users make better decisions in the moment.
AI Query Risk Check is a lightweight chatbot prototype that helps workplace users determine through whether a planned AI query is likely low risk, needs revision, or should be reviewed before use.
The demo version was built in approximately 4 hours, including basic QA. It uses a structured Voiceflow intake workflow, an LLM-assisted prompt risk interview, and an API-driven guidance lookup to give users practical, plain-language guidance.
More employees are using AI tools in daily work, and organizations need simple ways to help people pause before sharing sensitive, confidential, regulated, or decision-related information. However, many organizations are not creating or using clear AI governance policies and employees are turning to using personal accounts with corporate information.
This bot is not designed to approve AI use or replace internal policy. It is an informational triage assistant that helps users identify risk signals, consider safer prompt approaches, and decide whether a planned query should be revised or not used.
The prototype uses a hybrid design. A deterministic intake workflow collects consistent variables such as policy status, organization type, query purpose, data type, and output use. That workflow sets a minimum risk level before the user enters the more flexible prompt interview. The variables serve two purposes:
The Prompt Risk Interview playbook then asks for a high-level description of the planned AI task. The LLM can raise the risk level based on the user’s description, but it cannot lower the minimum risk set by the workflow. This keeps the governance-critical logic predictable while still allowing natural conversation.
After the risk interview, Voiceflow sends a JSON payload through a Make webhook to simulate a full API POST integration. Make receives the structured lookup key, searches a Google Sheets guidance table, and returns JSON containing the matching guidance card, safer prompt template, and next step.
This API pathway demonstrates structured data passing, external system integration, next-best-action retrieval, and scalable content maintenance outside the bot. GPT-5 nano is used for both agents because the classification task is bounded by deterministic intake variables, controlled lookup keys, and external guidance content. As the capabilities of the chatbot expand, the model may need to be upgraded based on the complexity of the tasks.
Future enhancements and adjustments may include:
This demo provides general risk-awareness guidance only. Please do not enter real sensitive, confidential, regulated, personal, customer, student, employee, financial, health, HR, legal, proprietary, or security-related information.
The chat widget launches from the lower-right corner of the page. Use the button above if the widget is minimized.